TUJUAN TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DALAM PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KERJA SAMA PADA SITKOM SO NOT WORTH IT

Authors

  • Ko Yoo Kyung Bahasa Korea, Fakultas Bahasa dan Sastra, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47313/aksarabaca.v2i2.3175

Abstract

ABSTRAKKetidaksempurnaan dalam proses komunikasi dapat terjadi akibat peserta tutur tidak mematuhi maksim maksim di dalam prinsip kerja sama. Pelanggaran tersebut dapat disebabkan adanya maksud dan tujuantertentu yang hendak disampaikan oleh peserta tutur melalui suatu ujaran tindak tutur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentukbentuk pelanggaran terhadap prinsip kerja sama dalam sitkom So Not Worth Itserta fungsi tindak tutur yang timbul akibat pelanggaran tersebut. Data penelitian diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik simak catat dengan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Data penelitian berupa tuturan dialogpada sitkom So Not Worth It dianalisis mengunakan landasan teori pragmatik mengenai teori prinsip kerja sama Grice (1975) dan teori fungsi tindak tutur Searle (1979). Penelitian terhadap tuturan dialog sitkom So NotWorth It ditemukan 4 (empat) bentuk pelanggaran terhadap maksim-maksim dalam prinsip kerja sama Grice yaitu maksim kuantitas, kualitas, relevansi, dan cara. Pelanggaran terhadap prinsip kerja sama yang ditemukan melalui penelitian didominasi oleh pelanggaran terhadap maksim kuantitas sebanyak 7 (tujuh) tuturan. Kemudian sebanyak 5 (lima) tuturan melanggar maksim kualitas, 5 (lima) tuturan melanggar maksimrelevansi, dan 4 (empat) tuturan melanggar maksim cara. Keseluruhan pelanggaran terhadap maksim dalam prinsip kerja sama Grice dalam sitkom So Not Worth It terjadi sebanyak 21 data tuturan. Selanjutnya penelitianini menemukan 4 (empat) fungsi tindak tutur yang timbul akibat pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama tersebut, yaitu fungsi tindak tutur asertif, ekspresif, direktif, dan komisif. Kata kunci: Fungsi Tindak Tutur, Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama, Pragmatik. ABSTRACTImperfections in the communication process can occur due to speech participants not complying with the maxims in the principle of cooperation. This violation can be caused by certain aims and objectives that thespeech participant wishes to convey through a speech act utterance. This research aims to describe the forms of violations of the principle of cooperation in the sitcom So Not Worth It as well as the function of speech acts that arise as a result of these violations. Research data was obtained using note-taking techniques with descriptive qualitative methods. Research data in the form of dialogue utterances in the sitcom So Not Worth Itwere analyzed using the basis of pragmatic theory regarding Grice's (1975) cooperative principle theory and Searle's (1979) speech act function theory. Research on the dialogue utterances of the sitcom So Not Worth Itfound 4 (four) forms of violations of the maxims in Grice's principles of cooperation, namely the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance and method. Violations of the principle of cooperation found through researchwere dominated by violations of the maxim of quantity in 7 (seven) utterances. Then, 5 (five) utterances violated the maxim of quality, 5 (five) utterances violated the maxim of relevance, and 4 (four) utterancesviolated the maxim of manner. Overall violations of the maxim in Grice's principle of cooperation in the sitcom So Not Worth It occurred in 21 utterances. Furthermore, this research found 4 (four) functions of speech acts that arise as a result of violations of the principle of cooperation, namely the functions of assertive, expressive, directive and commissive speech acts. Keywords: Function of Speech Acts, Violation of the Principle of Cooperation, Pragmatics

References

Bogdan, Robert C dan Steven Taylor. 1992.Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach in The Social Sciences. Alih bahasa oleh Arief Furchan, John Wiley, dan Sons. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. 2004. Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Choe Jae-woong. 2009. “격률의 의도적위반이 유발하는 한축의 귀추법적

추론 (Abduction as an Inference for Implicatures due to Flouting of

Maxims)”. Linguisti c Research. 26 회3 집.

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation, Syntax and Semantic, Speech Act 3. New York: Academic Press.

Indrayani, Luh Komang dkk. 2018. “Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama

dalam Variety Show Jepang Gyouretsu no Dekiru Houritsu Soudanjo”. Jurnal Humanis, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Unud.

Vol. 22: h.971-979.

Jayati, Vivi Indri. 2020. “Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama dan Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Tokoh Utama dalam Film Tuili Biji Karya Zhang Tianhui”. Jurnal Unesa. Vol.3 No.22.

Kim Bo-bin. 2015. “시트콤 ‘Friends’에 나타는Grice 의 격률과 유머 분석” (An Analysis of Humors in the Sitcom

‘Friends’ Based on Grice’s Maxim). 조선대학교 교육대학원.

영어교육전공.

Ko Kyeong-hee. 2019. “미국, 한국, 스페인영화에 나타난 특정대화함축

비교분석” (Analysis of Particularized Conversational Implicatures in the

Movies of America, Korea, and Spain). 제주대학교 대학원:

영어영문학과.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit

Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Levinson, Stephen C. 1985. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liptak, Peter dan Lee Si-woo. 2015. Korean Slang: As Much as A Rat’s Tail. Exile Press LLC.

Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Radja Grafindo

Persada.

Meirisa, Yumna Rasyid dan Fathiaty Murtadho. 2017. “Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia”. Bahtera: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. Vol.16 No.2: h.1-

Nam Gi-shim dan Go Yeong-gun. 1999. 표준국어문법론. 서울시: 탑출판사. Nursya’bani, Purnama. 2006. Manajemen Kualitas Perspektif Global. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia

Park Young-soon. 2013. 한국어 화용론. 서울: 대진서.

Purwo, Bambang Kaswanti. 2001. Linguistik Indonesia. Jakarta: Gunung Agung. -----------. 1990. Pragmatik dan Pengajaran

Bahasa: Menyibak Kurikulum 1984. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2005. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Richards, J., John Platt dan Heidi Weber. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.

Rohmah, Isnaini Fadlilatul. 2020. Fungsi Tindak Tutur dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Dialog Film Korea

Selatan The Negotiation. Skripsi. Universitas Gadjah Mada: Yogyakarta.

Rossa, Venessa Orchita. 2016. Implikatur Percakapan dalam Acara The Comment pada NET TV. Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara: Medan.

Rusminto, Nurlaksana Eko. 2015. Analisis Wacana: Sebuah Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Searle, Jhon R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society. Vol. 5 No. 1: h.1-23. -----------. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in The Theory of Speech Act. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University. Walija. 1996. Bahasa Indonesia dalam Perbincangan. Jakarta: IKIP Muhammadiyah Jakarta Press.

Yule, George. 1996. The Study of Language. Cambridge: University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19