Evaluasi Kualitas Citra Mamografi Metode Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) Menggunakan Normalized Anisotropic Quality Index (NAQI)

Main Article Content

Ririn Septya Anggraini
Ni Larasati Kartika Sari
Idris Kusuma
Febria Anita

Abstract

Mammography image is expected to have high image resolution quality so that the image is able to show microcalcifications as a sign of a malignant breast tumor with a size ranging from 0.1 mm. Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) is an image acquisition mode in mammography that is designed to strike a balance between patient dose and image quality by accommodating differences in breast size. This study aims to obtain the results of measuring mammographic image quality using Normalized Anisotropic Quality Index (NAQI), assessing the performance of AEC against variations in Compressed Breast Thicknes (CBT), density and Average Glandular Dose (AGD). This study using 20 mammographic images in AEC mode, Cranio Caudal (CC) projections. The data in the forms of CBT, breast density and AGD were also taken. In this study, the CBT range was 45-81 mm, the density range was 14-18%, the AGD range was 1.25-2.26 mGy with the patient's age ranged from 39-67 years and the compression pressure ranged from 20.0169-157.9111 N. Then the images are grouped based on CBT, density and AGD, to get the NAQI values. The results of NAQI values are e ues sults o(0.111-2). The highest NAQI value obtained on CBT images of 61 mm, density 14.64% and AGD 1.41 mGy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggraini, R. S., Sari, N. L. K., Kusuma, I., & Anita, F. (2022). Evaluasi Kualitas Citra Mamografi Metode Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) Menggunakan Normalized Anisotropic Quality Index (NAQI). Jurnal Ilmiah Giga, 25(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.47313/jig.v25i2.1651
Section
Articles

References

Bushberg, J. T., The essential physics of medical imaging, Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012, pp. 360-370.

Caroll, Quinn B. M ed. RT., Radiography The Digital Age, 3rd Edition, 2018, pp. 238-246.

de Oliveira, H. C. R., Barufaldi, B., Borges, L. R., Gabarda, S., Bakic, P. R., Maidment, A. D. A., Schiabel, H., & Vieira, M. A. C., Validation of no-reference image quality index for the assessment of digital mammographic images. Medical Imaging 2016: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 9787, 978713. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217229

Barufaldi, B., Borges, L. R., Vieira, M. A. C., Gabarda, S., Maidment, A. D. A., Bakic, P. R., Pokrajac, D. D., & Schiabel, H., The effect of breast composition on a no-reference anisotropic quality index for digital mammography, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 226–233, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_30

Louk, A. C., & Suparta, G. B., Pengukuran Kualitas Sistem Pencitraan Radiografi Digital Sinar-X, Berkala MIPA, Universitas Gajah Mada, ISSN: 0215-9309, Vol. 24, Issue 2, 2014.

Fajarini, E. S., Estimasi Mean Glandular Dose MGD pada Computed Magography Computed Radiography (CR), Lontar Universitas Indonesia, 2011, pp. 61-62.

Dance, D.R., Christofides, S., Maidment, A. D. A., McLean, I. D., Ng, K. H., Diagnostic Radiology Physics, A Handbook for Teachers and Students, IAEA, ISBN 978–92–131010–1 2014, pp. 400-410.

Artha, I G.S., Sianipar, R.H., S.T., M.Eng. Dr., Adnyani, I. A. S., S.T., M.Eng., Dr., Restorasi Citra Berbasis Domain Frekuensi Menggunakan Tapis Eliptik, http://eprints.unram.ac.id/8279, 2018.

Gabarda, S., Cristóbal, G., & Goel, N. (n.d.), Anisotropic blind image quality assessment: Survey and analysis with current methods, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, ISSN: 1095-9076,

Bakic, P. R., Zhang, C., & Maidment, A. D. A., Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm, Medical Physics, 38(6), pp. 3165–3176, June 2011, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3590357

Barufaldi, B., Borges, L. R., Bakic, P. R., Vieira, M. A. C., Schiabel, H., & Maidment, A. D. A. (2017). Assessment of automatic exposure control performance in digital mammography using a no-reference anisotropic quality index. Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 10136, 101360U. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2255629

AAPM, Equipment Requirements and Quality Control for Mammography, Report no.29, 1990.

IAEA, Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography, Report no.17, 2011.

Tole, N., Professor of Medical Physicist and Senior Lecturer, The Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Medicine, University of Nairobi, A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment for The Award of Master’s of Medicine Degree in Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Medicine, ©2018.

Hintenlang, D. E., Dose Measurement in Mammography; What are we we measuring? Lecture Notes, University of Florida, 2018.

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, What Does It Mean to Have Dense Breasts. https://cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/dense-breasts.htm, 2021.

P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML MOBK010-FM WangBovik MOBK010-WangBovik.cls, Modern Image Quality Assessment, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2200/S00010ED1V01Y2005081VM003

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research.2022. CenterWhat’s the best way to screen dense breasts. https://.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2020/02/what-s-the-best-way-to-screen-dense-breasts-.html (diakses tanggal 15 februari 2022)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 2022. Anatomy of the Breast. https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/types/breast/anatomy-breast.com

(diakses tanggal 15 februari 2022)

https://automatic-exposure-control-aec-l.jpg(1024×768.(slideserve.com) (diakses tanggal 15 februari 2022)

Gray, J., Princehorn, J.A., Grids Improve Mammography Contrast, 2004, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Grids-Improve-Mammography-Contrast-Gray-Princehorn/cc1bd5729a2d121db3e3cab1b2fc3eeed0aa1a3a (diakses tang-gal 15 februari).