Pancasila Dan Keindonesiaan Tarik Menarik Pemaknaan dan Perwujudan Pancasila

Authors

  • Hamdan Zoelva -

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47313/jkik.v4i1.1099

Abstract

Amid the atmosphere of the PSBB because of the threat of Covid19 public were surprised by the decision of the meeting Parpurna house of representatives passed the draft law on the Bow of the Ideology of Pancasila (RUU HIP), as the initiative RUU of the house of representatives. The response of the audience was crowded, and happens resistance from various parties, not only from the Islamic but also from other circles. Pull understanding of Pancasila and its manifestations in the life of the country is commonplace occur in the stage of post-constitutional (lower stage). One of them is the fact that the religion of Islam as the power of the majority nation, Indonesia is the objective conditions that can not be ignored in any policy of the state, that proved to be the doctrine and Islamic law continues to transform in a variety of forms of state policy. Throughout the process of constitutional democracy are respected and become the cornerstone in the life of the state because of the influence of Islamic values in the embodiment of Pancasila on the policy of the state, then the system will continue to take place.

References

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.). Ayat 3

Budiarjo, M. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Utama.

de Montesquieu, Baron. (1949). The Spirit of The Laws transleted by Thomas Nugent. New

York: Hafner Press.

Ismatullah, D. (2001). Check and Balances dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Negara Indonesia

dalam Pola Ideal Hubungan Eksekutif-Legislatif, Jurnal Civity, Forum Indonesia

Satu, Jakarta.

Legowo, T. (2002). Paradigma Checks and Balances dalam Hubungan Eksekutif dan

Legislatif dalam Melanjutkan Dialog Menuju Reformasi Konstitusi di Indonesia.

Jakarta: International IDEA.

Nasution, A. B. (2007). Arus Pemikiran Konstitusionalisme, Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta.

Pasal 1 ayat 2 UUD 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 11 ayat 2 Undang-Undang 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 13 Ayat 2 dan 3 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 14 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 14 ayat 2 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 2 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 20 ayat 2 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 20A ayat 2 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pasal 7C Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (n.d.).

Pidato Soekarno. (1998). Risalah Sidang Badan Penyelidik Usaha-Usaha Persiapan

Kemerdekaan Indonesia (BPUPKI) tanggal 1 Juni 1945 rapat BPUPKI. Jakarta:

Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Pieris, J. (2007). Pembatasan Konstitusional Kekuasaan Presiden RI. Jakarta: Pelangi

Cendikia.

Poerbapranoto, K. (1975). Sistem Pemerintahan Demokrasi. Bandung: Ersco.

Ricklefs. (2005). Sejarah Modern Indonesia. Gajahmada University Press.

Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (1992). Risalah Sidang Badan Penyelidik UsahaUsaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia., (p. 52).

Sudharmono. (1997). Beberapa Pemikiran Tentang Pancasila dan Undang - Undang Dasar

Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Pelaksanaan Pedoman Penghayatan dan Pengamalan

Pancasila.

Yamin, M. (n.d.). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia,Julie Keempat.

Jakarta: Yayasan Pranata.

Zoelva, H. (2016). Mengawal Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.

Zoelva, H. (2019). Implementasi Ideologi Pancasila.

Zoelva, H. (2020). Webinar Bertajuk Pancasila, Islam dan Kebangsaan. Jakarta: Universitas

Nasional

Downloads

Published

2021-03-17