PENGAMBILAN SUMPAH UNTUK BUKTI BARU DARI TERMOHON PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PERDATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47313/njl.v6i1.1599Abstract
Abstract
Submitting a judicial review (PK) at the Supreme Court, both criminal and civil cases, one of the material requirements is the discovery of new evidence or fresh fact or new circumstances, called novum. The material reason for the Judicial Review (Peninjauan Kembali) of criminal cases is called "new circumstances", contained in Article 263 Paragraph (2) letter a of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. The form of new evidence or novum in civil cases, referred to as "decisive evidence letters", is stated in Article 67 letter b of Law no. 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court in conjunction to Law No. 5 of 2004 in conjunction to Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment. Although using different terms about the novum (criminal procedure code and civil procedure code), the actual meaning is not different. The difference is that in criminal cases it is not explicitly stated about the evidence/the form of novum, where the novum was obtained, contained or attached. But new evidence or novum in civil cases is expressly called "with documentary evidence", then the new evidence or novum is documentary evidence. In criminal cases, the form of evidence for a novum is not mentioned, so the form of a new situation or novum in a criminal case can be obtained from letter evidence or witnesses. The important thing is that the contents of the novum are in the form of new conditions that previously, when the case was examined at the first level of court, the new circumstances had not been revealed in the trial of the first level court. For applicants for reconsideration (PK) Novum or new evidence in the form of a letter based on Article 69 letter b of Law no. 14 of 1985, since the discovery of the documents of evidence, the day and date of their discovery must be declared under oath and ratified by the competent authority. However, the law (No. 14 of 1985) does not regulate the Novum or new evidence held by the Respondent for Judicial Review, in the form of a counter memory from the Judicial Review with additional new evidence, whether it must be declared under oath and ratified by an authorized official. This can cause problems because of the difference in the strength of the evidence between novum of the Judicial Review of the Petitioner and the Judicial Review of the Respondent. In order to have a legally balanced strength of evidence, it is better if new evidence or novum from the Respondent from the Judicial Review is also regulated in the procedural law, which is sworn in and ratified by an authorized official.
Key word: Judicial Review; novum; new evidenc; equality before the law; The power of
evidence.
References
Ali, Achmad, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis) (Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 2002)
Amin, S. M., Hukum Acara Pengadilan Negeri (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1981)
Farid, H.A. Zainal Abidin, Hukum Pidana I (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007)
KUHAP dan KUHP, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2002)
Kehakiman RI, Departemen, Kamus Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Cicero Indonesia,1988)
Irsan, Koesparmono dan Armansyah, Panduan Memahami Hukum Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana, (Bekasi: Gramata Publishing, 2016)
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006)
Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman, Sistem Pembuktian Dan Alat-Alat Bukti, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983)
Rato, Dominikus, Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum (Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2010)
Simorangkir, J.C.T., Kamus Hukum, (Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983)
Soesilo, R., Hukum Acara Pidana Prosedur Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP Bagi Penegak Hukum, (Bogor: Politeia, 1982)
Tas, H. Van der, Kamus Hukum Belanda Indonesia, (Jakarta: Timun Mas, 1961)
Tongat, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan, (Malang, UMM Pres, 2008)
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 14 tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1985 Nomor 73, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3316.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 3, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4958.
Het Herzien Inlandsche Reglement (HIR)
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Strafrecht)
Doctorhukum.com, “Teori Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Pidana”, https://doktor hukum.com /teori-pembuktian-dalam-hukum-pidana/
