META-ANALISIS: PROFIL TINGKAT KESIAPTERAPAN TEKNOLOGI HASIL PENELITIAN SOSHUM DI UNSOED TAHUN 2017-2019

Authors

  • Nuniek Ina Ratnaningtyas Fakultas Biologi Universitas Jendersl Soedirman
  • Dian Bhagawati Fakultas Biologi Universitas Jendersl Soedirman
  • Sri Hartini Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Saparso Saparso Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47313/jib.v41i72.1023

Keywords:

a metaanalysis, research skim, Technology Readiness Level (TKT)

Abstract

The community service program (PPM) is the third Dharma college that must be implemented by all lecturers. The method used is generally in the form of technology transfer, either through training, education or hands-on practice. The technology applied must be a proven technology, no longer trial and error. The success of a university in carrying out PPM will be reflected in the performance achieved each year. The first year of research was focused on examining the research scheme managed by LPPM Unsoed with BLU funds for 2017-2019; the amount of funded research in the Soshum field and its suitability with TKT. The method used is a metaanalysis with a systematic review model, which is followed by FGD. The data and information obtained were analyzed thoroughly with an inductive approach based on the results of observations, interviews, discussions and secondary data to compile a descriptive abstraction with the stages of data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results showed that there were 6 (six) research schemes that were always held by LPPM Unsoed in 2017-2019, namely: International Research Collaboration (IRC), Unsoed Leading Research, Unsoed Institutional Research, Competency Improvement Research, Beginner Lecturer Research and Special Task Facilities Professor. The number of Leading Research Development which was funded for the 2017-2019 period, in the Soshum field was 37 titles and Applied Leading Research which was funded for the 2018-2019 period, as many as 28 titles. Leading Research Development that has been carried out has conformity with TKT levels 7 and 8, while Applied Leading Research has conformity with TKT level 5 and level 6 with indicators for each Level of Technology Readiness (TKT) of Social Humainora and Education Types, according to Permenristekdikti 42/2016.

References

Allen, M., Rayond W. Preiss, Barbara Mae Gayle & Nancy Burrel.

(2012). Interpersonal Communication Research Advances Through

Meta-Analysis, (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher,

, p. 3.

Arwanto & K. B. Prayitno. (2014). “Tekno-Meter Pengukuran Tingkat

Kesiapan Teknologi: Suatu Upaya Mengurai Stagnasi Inovasi di

Lembaga Litbang dan Penguatan Hubungan Pemasok-Pengguna,” in

Prosiding Forum Tahunan Pengembangan Iptek dan Inovasi nasional,

, p. 205

Daulay, H. 2016. Kesiapan Pelaksanaan Pengukuran dan Penetapan TKT untuk Hasil Riset dan Pengembangan Teknologi Tahun Anggaran

Day, G. S., P. J. Schoemaker & R. Gunther. (2000). Managing Emerging Technologies. The Wharton School, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat. (2020). Panduan Program Penerapan Teknologi Tepat Guna Kepada Masyarakat. Direktorat Riset Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Deputi Bidang Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan Kementerian Riset Dan Teknologi/ BRIN. Jakarta.

Elmatsani, H. M. (2017). Pengembangan Aplikasi Pengukuran TKT

Online. Jurnal Rekayasa Elektrika, 13(3), 185-190.

Kemenristek Dikti, 2018. Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada

Masyarakat Edisi XII. Edisi Revisi 2019. Direktorat Riset dan

Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Dirjen Penguatan Riset dan

Pengembangan. Kemenristek Dikti, Jakarta

Kemenristekdikti (2015). Permenristekdikti No. 44 Tahun 2015 tentang

Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi

Kemenristekdikti (2016). Peraturan Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan

Tinggi No. 42 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengukuran dan Penetapan Tingkat

Kesiapterapan Teknologi.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systemic Reviews.

Eversleigh: Keele University Technical Report.

Lee, M.C., T. Chang, & W.T.C. Chien. (2011). An Approach For Developing Concept of Inovation Readiness Levels,” International Journal of Managing Information Technology. 3(2)

Lehoux, P., Poland, B., & Daudelin, G. (2006). Focus group research and “the patient’s view.” Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2091-2104

LPPM Unsoed. (2016). Buku Panduan Penyusunan Proposal Penelitian.

LPPM Unsoed. Purwokerto

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik

Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengukuran dan Penetapan

Tingkat Kesiapan Inovasi

Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2002 tentang Sistem Nasional Penelitian, Pengembangan, dan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi.

Wahyuningrum, H., & Desrianti, O. (2018). Kajian Evaluasi Tingkat

Kesiapterapan Teknologi (TKT) Penelitian Di Batan.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-21

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.