A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ARTICLE 241 KOREAN CRIMINAL ACT AND ARTICLE 284 INDONESIAN CRIMINAL CODE.

Authors

  • Ahmad Sobari Universitas Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v1i2.202

Abstract

As the nations that have ratified the Declaration of Human Rights and both have established constitutional rights for citizens in the Constitution of each country, Indonesia and Korea have been conforming the Code /Act to the Convention. This paper is an account of  comparing the Law about Act/Code on Adultery, in Korea and in Indonesia. The method is a comparative analysis of the Law, employing normative perspective. The finding of the account is that the Article 241 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 293 of 1963, of Korea (the last amendment on April 5th, 2013 by the Law No. 11731) has in common with the contents of the Article 284 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Indonesian Penal Code or Wetboek van Strafrecht. The Indonesian Penal Code on adultery has been emanated mostly by Pancasila’s ideology in which  the principle of Islamic morality and the morality of customary people appear in it; the adultery and fornication are quite contrary to the values of customary law, customs, also quite contrary to the moral values of religions.

 

Keywords: Article 241 Korean Criminal Act,  Article 284 Indonesian Criminal Code, Adultery, Sharing The Act/Code. Religious Values, Pancasila

References

Anwar, H.A.K Moch., Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II), Jilid II (Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 1986).

Constitutional Court of Korea, Constitutional Court Decisions Vol. II (2005-2008) (Seoul, 2009).

Honore, Tony, About Law, An introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

Korean Criminal Act, as amended on April 5th, 2013 by the Law No. 11731.

Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia, Kamus Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: PT Cicero Indonesia, 1988).

Moeljatno, Indonesian Criminal Code [KUHP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana] (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2006)

Ranuhandoko, I.P.M, Terminology Hukum, Inggris-Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2000)

법률출판사, 2014 기본법전 (서울: 법률출판사, 2014).

Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MK, 2006).

Internet

Ajimumpung, Sejarah Hukum Jepang, http://tafafari.blogspot.kr/2014/05/sejarah-hukum-jepang.html.

Constitutional Court of Korea, Adultery Case, http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/ eng/decisions/majorde-cisions/majorDetail.do?SearchClassCode=ENEXECLSS&search ClassSeq=519.

Definisi adultery’, http://www.artikata.com/arti-2984-adultery.html.

http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/44021/3/Chapter%20II.pdf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery

The doctrine and Law of Marriage, Adultery, and Divorce at Google Books.

The Guardian, Soth Korea Legalises adultery, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/ feb/26/south-korea-legalises-adultery.

Vhison Az, Dasar Hukum Zina Sebagai Delik Dalam KUHP, http://perzinaan-hukum. blogspot.kr/2013/09/ dasar-hukum-zina-sebagai-delik-dalam.html.

Wetboek van Strafrecht (versi Bahasa Inggris), http://www.hukumonline.com/ pusatdata /download/ lt4c7b80e6173ef/node/lt4c7b7fd88a8c3.

Published

2017-03-23

Issue

Section

Articles