Pemetaan Konseptual Kajian Feminisme melalui Analisis Bibliometrik Visual terhadap Literatur Tahun 2015–2025
Kata Kunci:
bibliometrik, feminisme, VOSviewer , intersectionality , visualisasi jaringanAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan struktur konseptual dalam kajian feminisme melalui pendekatan bibliometric visual. Data dikumpulkan dari Google Scholar menggunakan perangkat lunak Publish or Perish, dan dianalisis dengan VOSviewer. Sebanyak 1.000 artikel ilmiah dari tahun 2015 hingga 2025 dianalisis melalui tiga jenis visualisasi: density, overlay, dan network, untuk mengungkap kepadatan istilah, dinamika temporal, serta relasi antar topik dalam diskursus feminisme global. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa “second wave feminism”, “radical feminism”, dan “popular feminism” merupakan fondasi utama dalam wacana feminisme kontemporer, yang masih kuat dipengaruhi oleh kerangka ideologis klasik. Namun, munculnya istilah-istilah baru seperti “white feminism”, “transnational feminism”, dan “methodology” mencerminkan transformasi diskursus ke arah yang lebih reflektif, interseksional, dan inklusif secara global. Klaster-klaster yang teridentifikasi dalam visualisasi jaringan memperlihatkan kompleksitas relasi antar konsep, mulai dari hubungan feminisme dengan media populer, kapitalisme, pendidikan, hingga epistemologi keilmuan. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa kajian feminisme tidak hanya berkembang dalam jumlah tetapi juga mengalami pergeseran epistemologis menuju pendekatan transdisipliner dan kritis. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi dalam pemetaan intelektual feminisme dan membuka ruang bagi riset lanjutan yang lebih kontekstual, metodologis, dan berbasis data.
Abstract
This study aims to map the conceptual structure of feminist scholarship through a visual bibliometric approach. Data were collected from Google Scholar using the Publish or Perish software and analyzed with VOSviewer. A total of 1,000 academic articles published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed through three types of visualization density, overlay, and network to reveal keyword density, temporal dynamics, and thematic relationships within global feminist discourse. The analysis shows that “second wave feminism”, “radical feminism”, and “popular feminism” remain the foundational pillars of contemporary feminist thought, still strongly influenced by classical ideological frameworks. However, the emergence of newer terms such as “white feminism”, “transnational feminism”, and “methodology” indicates a shift toward a more reflective, intersectional, and globally inclusive discourse. The thematic clusters identified in the network visualization illustrate the complexity of interrelated concepts, including the intersections of feminism with popular media, capitalism, education, and epistemological inquiry. These findings suggest that feminist studies are not only expanding in volume but are also undergoing an epistemological shift toward more transdisciplinary and critical approaches. This study contributes to the intellectual mapping of feminism and opens new avenues for further research that is more contextual, methodological, and data-driven.
Referensi
Ahmed, Sara. 2021. Complaint! London: Duke University Press.
Banet, Sarah, and Weiser. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press.
Beck, Koa. 2021. White Feminism: From the Suffragettes to Influencers and Who They Leave Behind. New York: Atria Books.
Biber, Sharlene Nagy Hesse, and Patricia Lina Leavy. 2011. Feminist Research Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. 2017. On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New York: The New Press.
Donthu, Naveen, Satish Kumar, Debmalya Mukherjee, Nitesh Pandey, and Weng Marc Lim. 2021. “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 133(April):285–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman. 2023. “VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.20 Software Documentation.” Univeristeit Leiden (October):55.
Gill, Rosalind. 2007. “Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.” doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898.
Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2018. “The Shifting Terrain of Sex and Power: From the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ to #MeToo.” Sexualities 21(8):1313–24. doi: 10.1177/1363460718794647.
Harzing, Anne Wil, and Satu Alakangas. 2016. “Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison.” Scientometrics 106(2):787–804. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9.
Komarudin, Parman, Muhammad Sodiki, Imro Atut Toyyibah, Syahrani Syahrani, and Zakiyah Zakiyah. 2023. “Bibliometric Mapping of Research Developments Using Qardh Financing Topics On Google Scholar Using Vosviewer.” Islamic Banking : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah 8(2):275–302. doi: 10.36908/isbank.v8i2.716.
Massimo, Aria. 2017. “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis.”
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mongeon, Philippe, and Adèle Paul-Hus. 2016. “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis.” Scientometrics 106(1):213–28. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
Moral-muñoz, José A., Enrique Herrera-viedma, Antonio Santisteban-espejo, Manuel J. Cobo, Enrique Herrera-viedma, Antonio Santisteban-espejo, and Manuel J. Cobo. 2020. “Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An up- to-Date Review.” El Profesional de La Informa- Ción 29:1–20.
Pilcher, Jane, and Imelda Whelehan. 2016. Key Concepts in Gender Studies. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.
Soesantari, Tri, Fitri Mutia, and Endang Gunarti. 2024. “The Role of Village Libraries in Supporting the Women-Friendly and Child- Caring Village Program.” 6(4):743–52.
Thoyib, Muhammad Edy, Chaerul Rochman, Universitas Islam, Negeri Maulana, Malik Ibrahim, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sunan, and Gunung Djati. 2024. “Bibliometric Analysis on Gender and Spirituality in Literary Studies.” 24(2):372–85. doi: 10.24071/joll.v24i2.8672.
Zupic, Ivan, and Tomaž Čater. 2015. “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization.” Organizational Research Methods 18(3):429–72. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
- Hak publikasi atas semua materi informasi yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini dipegang oleh dewan redaksi/editor dengan sepengetahuan penulis. Pengelola Jurnal akan menjunjung tinggi hak moral penulis.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonCommercial-No Derivative (CC BY-NC-ND), yang berarti bahwa hanya dengan izin penulis, informasi dan artikel Jurnal BACA dapat didistribusikan ke pihak lain dengan tanpa merubah bentuk aslinya untuk tujuan non-komersial.
- Setiap terbitan Populis Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, baik cetak maupun elektronik, bersifat open access untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Di luar tujuan tersebut, penerbit atau pengelola jurnal tidak bertanggung jawab atas terjadinya pelanggaran hak cipta yang dilakukan oleh pembaca atau pengakses.