PEMETAAN KONSEPTUAL KAJIAN FEMINISME: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK VISUAL MENGGUNAKAN VOSVIEWER
Keywords:
bibliometrik, feminisme, VOSviewer , intersectionality , visualisasi jaringanAbstract
This study aims to map the conceptual structure of feminist scholarship through a visual bibliometric approach using data from Google Scholar, collected via the Publish or Perish software and analyzed with VOSviewer. A total of 1,000 academic articles published between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed. Three types of visualizations—density, overlay, and network—were employed to identify thematic density, temporal trends, and keyword co-occurrence within the literature on feminism. The results show that terms such as second wave feminism, radical feminism, and popular feminism dominate the field and serve as the foundation of contemporary feminist discourse. Meanwhile, terms such as white feminism, transnational feminism, and methodology have recently emerged, indicating a shift in research interest toward more reflective, intersectional, and global feminist frameworks. The network visualization reveals distinct thematic clusters that illustrate the complexity and diversity of feminist approaches. These findings suggest that feminist scholarship is evolving from ideological roots toward more methodological and transnational reflexivity. This study contributes to the intellectual mapping of feminism and provides a basis for future interdisciplinary and context-specific feminist research.
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2021. Complaint! London: Duke University Press.
Banet, Sarah, and Weiser. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press.
Beck, Koa. 2021. White Feminism: From the Suffragettes to Influencers and Who They Leave Behind. New York: Atria Books.
Biber, Sharlene Nagy Hesse, and Patricia Lina Leavy. 2011. Feminist Research Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. 2017. On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New York: The New Press.
Donthu, Naveen, Satish Kumar, Debmalya Mukherjee, Nitesh Pandey, and Weng Marc Lim. 2021. “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 133(April):285–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman. 2023. “VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.20 Software Documentation.” Univeristeit Leiden (October):55.
Gill, Rosalind. 2007. “Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.” doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898.
Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2018. “The Shifting Terrain of Sex and Power: From the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ to #MeToo.” Sexualities 21(8):1313–24. doi: 10.1177/1363460718794647.
Harzing, Anne Wil, and Satu Alakangas. 2016. “Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison.” Scientometrics 106(2):787–804. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9.
Komarudin, Parman, Muhammad Sodiki, Imro Atut Toyyibah, Syahrani Syahrani, and Zakiyah Zakiyah. 2023. “Bibliometric Mapping of Research Developments Using Qardh Financing Topics On Google Scholar Using Vosviewer.” Islamic Banking : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah 8(2):275–302. doi: 10.36908/isbank.v8i2.716.
Massimo, Aria. 2017. “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis.”
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mongeon, Philippe, and Adèle Paul-Hus. 2016. “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis.” Scientometrics 106(1):213–28. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
Moral-muñoz, José A., Enrique Herrera-viedma, Antonio Santisteban-espejo, Manuel J. Cobo, Enrique Herrera-viedma, Antonio Santisteban-espejo, and Manuel J. Cobo. 2020. “Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An up- to-Date Review.” El Profesional de La Informa- Ción 29:1–20.
Pilcher, Jane, and Imelda Whelehan. 2016. Key Concepts in Gender Studies. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.
Soesantari, Tri, Fitri Mutia, and Endang Gunarti. 2024. “The Role of Village Libraries in Supporting the Women-Friendly and Child- Caring Village Program.” 6(4):743–52.
Thoyib, Muhammad Edy, Chaerul Rochman, Universitas Islam, Negeri Maulana, Malik Ibrahim, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sunan, and Gunung Djati. 2024. “Bibliometric Analysis on Gender and Spirituality in Literary Studies.” 24(2):372–85. doi: 10.24071/joll.v24i2.8672.
Zupic, Ivan, and Tomaž Čater. 2015. “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization.” Organizational Research Methods 18(3):429–72. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Hak publikasi atas semua materi informasi yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini dipegang oleh dewan redaksi/editor dengan sepengetahuan penulis. Pengelola Jurnal akan menjunjung tinggi hak moral penulis.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonCommercial-No Derivative (CC BY-NC-ND), yang berarti bahwa hanya dengan izin penulis, informasi dan artikel Jurnal BACA dapat didistribusikan ke pihak lain dengan tanpa merubah bentuk aslinya untuk tujuan non-komersial.
- Setiap terbitan Populis Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, baik cetak maupun elektronik, bersifat open access untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Di luar tujuan tersebut, penerbit atau pengelola jurnal tidak bertanggung jawab atas terjadinya pelanggaran hak cipta yang dilakukan oleh pembaca atau pengakses.
