THE CONTENT VALIDITTY OF THE SUMMATIVETEST OF IN THE SECOND SEMESTER OF THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS (A Case Study of SMAN 1 Cikarang Barat,- Bekasi)

Authors

  • Tita Puspitasari Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47313/pujangga.v2i1.384

Abstract

ABSTRACT
This study aims to clarify the matter summative validitasisi created by a professional team for the first
semester of the second year in SMAN 1 Cikarang, Bekasi. The number of items as many as 44 items, 40
multiple-choice and essay 6.Forty to about 4 questions for the reading and writing problems. The method in
this study using a qualitative description that describes the suitability of matter summative SMAN 1 Cikarang,
Bekasi with the syllabus and indicators. With a qualitative approach, researchers collected data by requesting
a booklet summative English and in the school syllabus. In addition, the researchers also conducted interviews
to a team of teachers who made a summative test questions. Furthermore, the researchers analyzed the items,
whether the matter has valisitasisi summative. The results obtained from this study proves that the question
summative English second semester of grade nine through percentage and analisisisi have validitasisi bad. In
addition, about summative bahasaInggris not in accordance with the existing indicators in the syllabus.
Problem grains in a summative test contained only two skills are measured. Two skills that are reading and
writing. Based comprehension ideally weight to 25% listening skills, speaking skills 25%, 25% reading skills,
and writing skills 25%. Thus, it can be concluded that the results of the study skills of reading reached
90.91% according to the syllabus of the test means can be said to be good. Meanwhile, for the listening skills
pesrentasinya only 9, 01%. It shows that the test questions are weak or invalid.

Key words: validitasisi, summative tests, syllabi English

Author Biography

Tita Puspitasari, Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

References

Airisan, Peter W. and Michael K. Russell. 2008. Classroom Assessment and Evaluation,

Sixthedition. New York: McGRAW-Hill Companies Inc.

Alderson, Carolin Clapham and Dianne Wall, J. Charles. 1995.Language Test

Construction and Evaluation.Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Allison, Desmond.11999.Language Testing and Evaluation (An Introductory Course).

Kent Ridge Crescent: Singapore University Press.

Arikunto, Suharsini. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rinekacipta.

Browers, Christopher Brumfit and Roger. 1991. Applied Linguistice and English Language

Teaching. Modern English Publication and The British Council.

Brown, James Dean.1996.Testing in Language Program. New Jessey: Hall Regents.

Finnochiaro, Mary and Sydney Sako. 1983.Foreign Language Testing. New York: Regent

Publishing Company, Inc.

Gareis, Christopher R and Leslie W. Grant. 2008. Teacher-Made Assessments: How to

Connect Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Learning. New York: Eye

OnEducation, Inc.

Genesee, F and A.U John. 1996. Classroom Based Evaluation in Second Language

Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Groundlund, Norman E. 1985. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching.USA: Mc. Millan

Publishing Company.

Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching. (Essex: Person Education

Limited), 4th Ed.

Harris, David P. Testing English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw-Hill Book

Company.

Heaton, J.B. 1998.Writing English Language Test. London and New York: Longman.

Hughes, Arthur.1987.Testing for English Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Press.

Jay, Ronald and Mark E. Swerdlik. 1993. Psychology Testing and Assessment: an

introduction to Test and Measurement. California: May Field PublishingCompany.

Nitko, Anthony J. 1983. Educational Test and Measurement An Introduction. NewYork:

Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, Inc.

Pengembangan Silabusdan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran dalam KTSP.2008.

Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan, Direktorat Jenderal, Peningkatan

Mutu Pendidikdan Tenaga Kependidikan, dan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Popham, W. James. 2003. Educational Evaluation. University of California. Los Angeles..

Sudijono, Anas. 1996. EvaluasiPendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tinambunan, Wilmar. 1988. Evaluation of Student Achievement. Jakarta: Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Wiersma, William. And Stephent G. Juts. Educational Measurement and Testing.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-02